translation of the redok article, part II
The same eve 20 to 30 obviously rightist mummed attackd the alternative center AZ Cooni. They smashed two windows, presented a banner with the slogan “February 13TH - evrything forgptten?” and run away, according to police announcement.
As the date of the “teariness march” was in the week, Neonazis called for rallies in several other cities. In Krefeld, Nordrhein Westfahlen, 250 right extremists marched in the evening, according to NPD, organizing this. Before about 3,500 citizen took part in one of the biggest anti-right demonstration of recent years, according to police.
In Borna, Saxony, the evening before about 70 rightist and 200 counter-manifesters gathered. In Zittau, Oberlausitz, Neonazis want to demonstrate this saturday; this event is announced by Stephan Roth, who was convicted by the court of Jelenia Gora for “assaulting the polish nation” and “goading on ethic hatred” to a conditioned sentence of 8 month prison.
Within the “actıon week there was also announced a “big final event”, including a speech of the historical revisionist Olaf Rose, known for his garment dyeing on Rodolf Hess and sice recent times parliamtary consultant of the NPD parliamentary group in Saxony like Naumann.
In Dresden some days before a commisiıon of historians presented its first results of the attempts to find an exact number of victims of the air raids. The comission was initiated by the former major of Dresden in late 2004. its work was about to be stopped, as local politicians stopped the financial supply. On January 18th the Dresden city parliament canceled the board`s decission. Under the leadership of Rolf-Dieter Müller (Bureau of militarian-historical investigation) the comission came to the provisional conclussion, there is no reason to estimate the number of victims more than 25,000. Numbers multiplied by 10 or even 20 a stated not just by right extrmists. Holger Apfel, head of the NPD parliamentary group in Saxony caused ourage by naming the air raids “bomb holocaust”.
so now some remarks. This article is anti nazi and İ think it is giving some background information. But it is not facing the revisionist attitude of the citizen. it is just stating, nazis would use the victims. But in fact there is no reason to cray about the date, maybe personal, for somebody who lost his relatives, but in a historical view its part of fighting back the germans, necessary and as it was sucessfull a reason for happiness.
There is more and more th attitude to cry about german “victims” of WW II, claiming there was a taboo so far, which in fact never existed. This is dangerous and maybe even more dangerous than the nazis itself.


'


